Star Trek – Review

Before I became a rabid SN fan, I was a rabid ST fan.  Raised on TNG and obsessing over DS9, I spent much of my high school and college years soothing my lonliness with going where no one has gone before.  But Voyager, Enterprise, Insurrection and Nemesis broke my heart and I left the fandom I used to love so much.  So how was the new movie?  Well…

(note: spoiler lie ahead)

The good?  McCoy, Spock, Pike and Sulu were spot on.  The special effects were top notch but intergrated well enough into it that we felt we were a part of the movie, not blinded by it.  Also, kudos to the makers for really upping the ante and actually putting this old cynic a bit on the edge.  Over all, there are worse ways to spend your hard earned cash.

The bad

I’m not going to harp on the time travel thing.  Certainly if you’ve been a trekkie for any amount of time you’ve learned to accept and coast through the shenanagins.  However, the event that kicks it all off doesn’t make sense even by the movie’s own logic.

Ok, a supernova threatens the galaxy. (let’s ignore how this would work for a moment)  Why then are only Spock and the romulans involved?  Shouldn’t the entire Federation, Klingon, Borg, Dominion, Cardassians, Ferengi, Cylons and Terminators be helping?  It does threaten them too.

However, Spock goes off to denoate his Deus Ex Bomb  but Romulus is destroyed by the supernova.  The images on screen show Romulus being destroyed by a shockwave.  How then did Spock get to where the star was in the first place?  (imagine the shockwave as a bubble)  Even assuming for near instant communication, how did Romulus get destoryed, Nero hear about it, and then beat Spock to the magic zone?  Spock would have to be travelling not only slower than Nero, but also a little slower than the shockwave (so again, how was he not destroyed).  Then, how was the Deus Ex bomb supposed to stop or prevent the supernova from destroying the rest of the galaxy?    Was it supposed to actually reverse the shockwave? (if so, why wasn’t Spock given a much faster ship?  like Nero’s)

Spock notes that Vulcans are an endangered species.  Really?  Romulans are a Vulcan off shoot that are still closely related enough to allow interbreeding.  TNG even had an episode where they found some Vulcans that had settled on a planet many years ago but remained primative.  Are they the only ones?  Why can Spock and the rest go and gather these lost cousins to repopulate the species? (and doesn’t their existence as well as Romulans mean Vulcans AREN’T an endangered species?)  Then there’s the ethical question, if Vulcan’s are endangered, should Spock be macking on a female outside his species?

Chekov was horrible.  Pretty much the textbook definition of Never Live it Down.  Scotty was even worse.  First and foremost Scotty was always a consumate professional (he was famous  for reading technical manuals for FUN) who really was the best.  He is not the buffon that Peg portrayed him as.  In the same line, I grew quite tired of the ENTIRE crew pretty much getting their ranks improperly.  Save for Spock and Checkov, every other crew member got their spot by trickery or death of a superior.  While once or twice isn’t bad, by the time it was happening to McCoy and Scotty I was sick of the trope.  Especially with those two who were always shown to be the best that there is.  McCoy and Scotty should NOT have needed a superior to die to get their ranks, they should have had them (on the Federation flagship no less) from the start.   That the crew of the enterprise were the best was always acceptable in the show because it was the federation flagship, you’d expect for the best to be on board.

As for Kirk himself?  First I refer you to this article.  I don’t entirely agree with her on it as there’s still a chance and room for Kirk to grow into the man we remember.  However, failure for the character to grow in any sequels would condemn Chris Pine in my opinion to always be inferior to Shatner.

Final word?  Well I’d actually rank it about equal with the Wolverine movie (and Terminator: Salvation above both of them).  The more you know about the source material, the more you’ll hate these films.  (conversely, if you know nothing about Star Trek, go enjoy the movie)  For each plus either movie has, there is an accompanying minus that drags the movie down to a little above average. (the only real difference is that ST really should be savored on the big screen while Wolverine can wait for DVD)

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Star Trek – Review

  1. I’d point out something that no one ever seems to see.

    A Flagship is a ship that carries a flag officer. That would be Commodore or some flavor of Admiral.

    While I am a Trek fan from the days when TOS was primetime I do hold that against them. There is no such thing as “Flagship of the Fleet”.

    I pretty much agree with your review. Add this to the mix….A supernova threatens the galaxy so they are going to fix it by creating a singularity in it. Ummm…..Supernovas are where singularities come from. It already had one.

    I’ll also say this: I laughed out loud, in a very exclusive theater (one of those that has powered reclining chairs and waiters to bring you drinks and food), when Kirk and Scotty beamed into the Enterprise and Scotty was trapped in that glorified water treatment system. Why did I laugh? There was a label on the tube he was being washed through that said “Inert Reactant”. Think about it.

    • I’ve heard that before and it’s something that’s been going on so long I just try to ignore it on ST. (kind of like the Federation having no money) Chalk it up to anomalies of the future maybe.

    • Ummm…..Supernovas are where singularities come from. It already had one.

      Maybe the star was too small to create a singularity when it nova’d, and were aiming to induce one? I don’t know, I had my brain turned off at that point.

  2. Would have liked to like that article you linked to, but the author doesn’t actually seem to have seen much ST or paid much attention to the movie. For example:

    1. Original Shatner Kirk also hacked the Kobayashi Maru program

    2. Kirk was thrown off the ship for being too violent and disagreeing with bureaucracy, but then he turned out to be RIGHT. That was the point.

    3. The new Trek portrayed Kirk as a reckless, insecure layabout because of the one thing that differentiated him from the old Kirk – he didn’t have a stable father figure. And this article seems to think that this message diminishes the role of a father? Doesn’t it make it more important?

    4 Spock isn’t ’emotionally distant’. He is a frickin’ Vulcan. And Uhura crushed on Spock in the original Trek as well. Kirk/Uhura only happened when both were brainwashed.

    • 1. Original Shatner Kirk also hacked the Kobayashi Maru program

      I didn’t see where the linked article mentioned that so I assume this is directed at me. And you’re right, he did. I didn’t like how the movie presented it though. Despite Shatner’s tendencies, Kirk wasn’t that much of a show off. Him gloating as he’s eating an apple is just all wrong (imagine ST2 if Kirk called Kahn after lowering the shields to taunt him). Also, does the followup hearing seem like it’s going to lead to the commendation he supposedly received for “creative thinking”?

      (no arguments with #2)

      #3 …he didn’t have a stable father figure. And this article seems to think that this message diminishes the role of a father? Doesn’t it make it more important?

      I will agree with you on this but like I said, if Kirk NEVER grows up as a man in any sequels then I will be disappointed.

      4 Spock isn’t ‘emotionally distant’. He is a frickin’ Vulcan. And Uhura crushed on Spock in the original Trek as well. Kirk/Uhura only happened when both were brainwashed.

      I admit that my knowledge of TOS is fuzzy (though I do know the Kirk-kiss-Uhura was a brainwashing bit) but what episodes was it shown that Uhura liked Spock? Seems that might have been helpful in “Amok Time” when Spock needed to get it on.

      • Despite Shatner’s tendencies, Kirk wasn’t that much of a show off. Him gloating as he’s eating an apple is just all wrong (imagine ST2 if Kirk called Kahn after lowering the shields to taunt him). Also, does the followup hearing seem like it’s going to lead to the commendation he supposedly received for “creative thinking”?

        I thought the way he was treated at the hearing was kind of the point – that the new Kirk, a troublemaker with a criminal record, would have been treated differently than the original Kirk when it came to cheating on a test.

        I agree that the showing off is OOC out of character for original Kirk, but then again he’s far younger and more immature here (again, the troubled background). He was also gloating at an inconsequential test – it wasn’t like any real people were getting hurt, so it’s quite unlike what him gloating at Khan would be like.

        I admit that my knowledge of TOS is fuzzy (though I do know the Kirk-kiss-Uhura was a brainwashing bit) but what episodes was it shown that Uhura liked Spock?

        I believe it was either the pilot or the first episode – she plays the harp and sings a song about how fascinated she is with him. The plot is kind of dropped later, but it’s definitely there.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s